DRAFT for review — not published. Claims marked [verify] in the source need Shawn's confirmation before this goes live (Rule 15).
Dominion Training Ltd.

Home / What we do

Our services

One team from the idea to the final report.

Most organisations can find a funding program. Fewer can scope the project properly, write an application that survives review, run the delivery, and produce the reporting a funder needs at the end. We do all of it, in sequence, on one file — which is why nothing falls into the gaps between consultants.

Two people signing an agreement across a table, photographed close and cropped at the wrists, one hand signing the final page with a fountain pen and another resting on the duplicate copy.
One agreement covers scoping, funding and delivery — so there is nobody to hand the file to, and nobody to blame. Illustrative photograph.

Why it matters

The gaps between stages are where projects die

A proposal written by someone who will never deliver it tends to promise things delivery cannot do. A delivery partner brought in after the money lands inherits a budget and a timeline they had no part in setting.

We have watched both failures. The application that over-commits on participant numbers because nobody checked the local labour pool. The training contract that cannot buy the equipment because the budget line was written for tuition. The final report that cannot evidence outcomes because nobody set up the tracking at intake.

Running all three stages on one file means the person writing the budget knows what an instructor costs, the person setting the participant target has recruited in a community that size before, and the reporting requirements are designed in at the start rather than reconstructed at the end.

  • One point of contact from first conversation to final report
  • Budgets written by the people who spend them — instructor days, equipment, fuel, PPE, transport and certification priced from delivery experience
  • Reporting designed at intake, so outcome data exists when the funder asks for it
  • Realistic participant targets — under-delivery on numbers is the most common reason a contribution agreement goes sideways

Where communities usually start

A conversation about a priority that has no funding attached to it yet — a road that needs building, members who need tickets, a stand that needs thinning. We work backwards from there to the program that fits.

Start that conversation →

What we will tell you honestly

Sometimes there is no program that fits, or the deadline has already passed for this field season, or the project needs an authorisation you do not hold yet. We would rather say that at the first meeting than write an application that was never going to succeed.

Tell us the priority, not the program

You do not need to know which fund you are applying to. Describe what the community needs built or who needs training, and we will tell you whether a program fits, what it would take, and what the timeline looks like.